Rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples of suspected patients using a novel one-step loop-mediated isothermal amplification (one-step LAMP) technique.

BACKGROUND: In the absence of effective antiviral drugs or vaccines, early and accurate detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is essential to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study developed and evaluated a novel rapid One-Step LAMP assay to directly detect the SARS-CoV-2 RNA from nasopharyngeal (NP) swab samples of patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection living in deprived areas in comparison to One-Step Real-time PCR. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-four NP swab samples from patients suspected of COVID-19 infection living in deprived western areas of Iran were tested by TaqMan One-Step RT-qPCR and fast One-Step LAMP assays. Tenfold serial dilutions of SARS-CoV-2 RNA standard strain where the viral copy number in each dilution was previously determined using the qPCR and various templates were used to investigate the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the One-Step LAMP assay in triplicate. Also, the efficacy and reliability of the method compared to TaqMan One-Step RT-qPCR were evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative clinical samples. RESULTS: The results of the One-Step RT-qPCR and One-Step LAMP tests were positive in 131 (51.6%) and 127 (50%) participants, respectively. Based on Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ), the agreement between the two tests was 97%, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The detection limit for the One-Step LAMP assay was 1 × 101 copies of standard SARS-CoV-2 RNA per reaction in less than an hour in triplicates. Negative results in all samples with non-SARS-CoV-2 templates represent 100% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the One-Step LAMP assay is an efficient consistent technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2 among suspected individuals due to its simplicity, speed, low cost, sensitivity, and specificity. Therefore, it has great potential as a useful diagnostic tool for disease epidemic control, timely treatment, and public health protection, especially in poor and underdeveloped countries.

Diagnostic power of one-step and two-step RT-qPCR methods to SARS­CoV­2 detection.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-2019) is a novel coronavirus known as Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV-2). The premier standard test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis is a one-step RT-qPCR method, which requires specific probes and reagents. Therefore, detection on a large scale is expensive and cannot be very accurate. METHODS: A cost-effective technique based on SYBR green was evaluated in the current study. The specific primers for S and N genes were designed, then performed the cross-reactivity test with other coronavirus and respiratory viruses positive samples. Moreover, the analytical sensitivity test was carried out with 8 dilutions (1:10). Lastly, the SARS-CoV-2 clinical samples (n = 210) were tested by these two methods, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to investigate the incremental diagnostic value of each gene in the study methods. RESULTS: The two-step method detected up to 6th dilutions of the SARS-CoV-2 samples and did not show any amplification of the positive samples of other respiratory viruses. ROC analysis revealed a diagnostic ability of the two-step method for SARS-CoV-2 with an area under the ROC curve of ≥ 0.7 (P Ë‚ 0.05) and relatively high sensitivity and specificity. The combination of N and S genes increased the sensitivity up to 88%, specificity up to 86%, and area under the ROC curve up to 0.85 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.72 to 0.93, P = 0.0461). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that the two-step method has comparable sensitivity and specificity to the one-step method. Therefore, this method can be considered a potential diagnostic method for diagnosing and monitoring COVID-19 patients. It suggests that when the one-step RT-qPCR method is not available, the two-step RT-qPCR can be used to identify SARS-CoV-2.

SARS-COV-2 RBD (Receptor binding domain) mutations and variants (A sectional-analytical study).

An essential step in SARS-CoV-2 infection is binding the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to the ACE2 receptor on the surface of host cells. Therefore, variation in this region can have crucial effects on clinical outcomes and the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) and variants of interest (VOIs). In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 54 patients with SARS-COV-2 infection were enrolled. After collecting samples and identifying the virus using the One-Step Real-Time qRT-PCR technique and confirming the viral infection, the region containing the RBD region for detection of any mutations was amplified using the Nested-PCR method. Finally, to identify probable mutations, the Nested-PCR product was sequenced. Our data show that the most mutant strains in circulation in our population are the delta variant (90.74%), alpha variant (5.56%), and omicron variant (3.70%), respectively. Pangolin Lineages strains were B.1.1.7(Alpha variant), B.1.617.2(Delta variant) and B.1.1.529(Omicron variant). Also, the mutation profile of variants suggests that N501Y, T478K, and D614G amino acid substitutions, are the significant mutations in the alpha and delta variants that are common with the Omicron variant. The highest frequency of clinical signs in the patients were: lung involvement (42.59%); fever, chills (40.74%); body pain (15%), and other signs (1.67%). Our data revealed that SARS-COV-2 RBD region variation results in substituting essential amino acids and the emergence of the new variant. We can consider it as a predictor for monitoring the emergence of variants of concerns and viral outcomes.